The general process framework applies to all originating claims filed in the District Courts on or after 1 April 2022 that are not subject to the specially managed civil list, simplified process or court dispute resolution frameworks.
Refer to the following for an overview of the general process framework:
The first general process case conference (CC) will be scheduled around 7 weeks from the date that the defence was filed.
A general process CC notice will be issued to inform the claimant and any other party who has filed a notice of intention to contest and/or defend the claim that the case has been identified for the general process. The notice will state the following:
If there is at least one party who is not represented by a lawyer, a physical general process CC will be scheduled. During the general process CC, the parties are to submit the following:
If both parties are represented by lawyers, the general process CC will be conducted on a “documents-only” basis. All updates, requests for directions, and directions given by the court must be communicated through eLitigation.
Further general process CCs may be convened if required by the court or on the parties’ application.
The court may, at the first general process CC, direct the parties to file the Single Application Pending Trial (SAPT).
A party who intends to file any application, besides those directed at a CC, must seek the court’s approval. This can be done by filing:
Parties should agree on the directions that they are seeking from the court before they attend any general process CC. If they cannot agree, they must inform the court of the items they disagree with and submit their respective positions on each item at the general process CC.
A party who fails to comply with the directions given and is seeking an extension of time to comply must inform the court:
If any party fails to provide the update on the progress of the matter, the list of directions sought, or fails to comply with the court’s directions, the court may proceed to give the necessary directions to the parties, to facilitate the progress of the case.
Where appropriate, the court may, at any general process CC, refer the case to court alternative dispute resolution (Court ADR) or allow time for the parties to engage in any other appropriate ADR process. There are 3 forms of Court ADR:
|Mediation||Mediation is not to determine who is at fault in the dispute. Rather, the mediator will assist the parties in negotiating and agreeing on a possible settlement to their dispute.|
|Conciliation||Conciliation is similar to mediation. It is not to determine who is at fault in the dispute. Instead, the conciliator at the conciliation hearing will assist the parties in negotiating and agreeing on a possible settlement to their dispute. Compared to mediators, conciliators play a more active role in suggesting optimal solutions for the parties|
|Neutral evaluation||Neutral evaluation applies only to civil cases where parties have requested a neutral evaluation. It involves the parties and their solicitors making presentations of their claims and defences, including the available evidence, followed by the judge of the Court Dispute Resolution Cluster giving an assessment of the merits of the case. This process is also useful for helping the parties to arrive at areas of agreement and to discuss methods of case management to save costs and time.|
Refer to Alternatives to trial for more information about ADR.
In deciding the mode of Court ADR, the court will consider, amongst other things, the factual matrix and the parties’ preference.
The primary aim of Court ADR is to facilitate open and frank discussions between parties to help them achieve an amicable resolution of their dispute. As such, all communications made in a Court ADR hearing will be marked by the judge as being confidential or without prejudice, except the terms of the settlement agreement (unless all the parties to the settlement agree to keep it confidential), consent judgments and consent orders of court.
If the action is not disposed of by the court or settled or resolved, the court will, at an appropriate stage, set down the matter for trial.
If the matter is set down by the date fixed by the court, a pre-trial case conference will be arranged and any outstanding general process CC will be set aside.
When the matter has been set down, the parties should seek extended timelines and/or permission to file any further applications at the general process CC or from the trial judge if one has been allocated.