Official website links end with .gov.sg
A Singapore Government Agency Website
Secure websites use HTTPS
Family Justice Courts Case Highlights
Search
Narrow your search
Filter
Filtered by:
Procedural applications
Clear all
Showing results 1-6 of 6.
WWM v WWN and another appeal [2024] SGHCF 27
The affidavits of means are intended to be those of the parties themselves. Any others may be filed only with leave.
Date of Decision: 05 Aug 2024
BOI v BOJ [2018] SGCA 61
Counsel are not the mere “mouthpieces” of their clients. They are not mere automatons, executing every instruction of the client.
Date of Decision: 04 Oct 2018
VWB v VWA [2023] SGHCF 13
All four factors relevant in deciding whether to grant an extension of time to appeal are of equal importance, to be balanced against one another, having regard to all the facts and circumstances of the case concerned (Lee Hsien Loong v Singapore Democratic Party and others and another suit [2008] 1 SLR(R) 757.
Date of Decision: 14 Mar 2023
VGY v VGZ [2020] SGHCF 6
Parties should assist the court in reaching a just decision and not flood the court with details that obscure rather than illuminate. Ancillary Matters proceedings are for parties to address the financial consequences of their divorce and not for parties to vent their frustrations.
Date of Decision: 04 Mar 2020
VWW v VWX [2021] SGHCF 35
The court can exercise its discretion to enter final judgment even though ancillaries have not been resolved but only under exceptional grounds, using equity as a guide.
Date of Decision: 22 Oct 2021
USD v USC [2021] SGHCF 4
Section 112 of the Women’s Charter 1961 cannot be invoked to allow parties to depart from their pleadings. Pleadings are binding on parties and the only remedy is amendment.
Date of Decision: 01 Mar 2021
Share this page:
